Hidden Double Tax Trap

SPEAKER_02 0:00

If you've ever, you know, dreamed of taking a job overseas, or maybe you're already a digital nomad working from a laptop in Lisbon or somewhere, there is this hidden tax trap just waiting for you. And it could literally drain thousands of dollars from your income.

SPEAKER_00 0:15

Oh, absolutely. It's a massive blind spot for so many expats.

SPEAKER_02 0:19

Right. But at the same time, there's a relatively obscure international treaty system that is specifically designed to save you from that exact trap. So today we are giving you a simple, powerful guide to keeping your money and, you know, securing your future retirement.

SPEAKER_00 0:34

Yeah, which is no small feat.

SPEAKER_02 0:36

Not at all. We're going to decode the complex and honestly just overwhelming world of international Social Security taxes for foreign workers.

SPEAKER_00 0:45

Aaron Powell It is a notoriously tangled web. I mean, truly. We're looking at financial regulations here that cross sovereign borders, spend decades of a worker's life, and involve the most formidable tax agencies on the planet.

SPEAKER_02 0:57

Aaron Powell Yeah, but to navigate this, we aren't just guessing. We are pulling directly from a massive stack of official documentation for this deep dive. Trevor Burrus, Jr.

SPEAKER_00 1:05

Right, getting right to the source material.

SPEAKER_02 1:06

Trevor Burrus Exactly. We've gone through the internal IRS and Social Security Administration codes. We've analyzed legal briefings from the nonprofit advisors at WagonMaker and Oberly, and studied the expat tax guides published by Greenback Tax Services.

SPEAKER_00 1:22

And bringing all of that together paints a surprisingly clear picture of what you actually need to do.

SPEAKER_02 1:27

Aaron Powell It really does. So let's just start with the baseline threat here. A worker steps off a plane to start a new job in a new country. What is the immediate financial hazard they're

Territoriality And Citizenship Clash

SPEAKER_02 1:38

walking into?

SPEAKER_00 1:38

Aaron Ross Powell Well, the baseline problem revolves around a concept called the territoriality rule.

SPEAKER_02 1:43

Aaron Powell The Territoriality Rule. Yeah.

SPEAKER_00 1:45

So in the realm of international tax law, the fundamental premise is that the country where you are physically standing and performing the labor has the inherent right to tax you. Aaron Powell Right.

SPEAKER_02 1:55

Which makes sense. Trevor Burrus, Jr.

SPEAKER_00 1:56

It does. I mean, if you're an American working in an office in Paris, France expects you to pay into their social security system. That's intuitive to most people. The complication arises because the United States is, well, one of the only countries on earth that taxes its citizens based on citizenship, regardless of geography.

SPEAKER_02 2:15

Aaron Powell Wait, so the U.S. government doesn't care if I haven't lived in the States for a decade. My passport alone means I'm on the hook.

SPEAKER_00 2:21

Trevor Burrus, Jr. Precisely. That's the trap. Without any special legal interventions, a U.S. citizen working abroad, or conversely, you know, a foreign national working in the U.S. is automatically legally obligated to pay Social Security taxes to both countries. Trevor Burrus, Jr.

SPEAKER_02 2:39

On the exact same earnings.

SPEAKER_00 2:40

On the exact same earnings, yeah. It is the absolute definition of dual taxation. Trevor Burrus, Jr.

SPEAKER_02 2:44

That is just staggering when you think about it. I mean, it's like buying a single movie ticket, but the theater owner and the movie studio both independently charge you full price at the door.

SPEAKER_00 2:54

That's a great way to put it.

SPEAKER_02 2:55

You are paying double for the exact same end goal, which is a retirement fund. And the percentages we're talking about here, they aren't small, right?

SPEAKER_00 3:02

Oh, they're very significant. So for a standard W-2 employee, you're looking at the FICA tax, which is 7.65% of your income.

SPEAKER_02 3:09

Okay.

SPEAKER_00 3:09

So that's that's 6.2% going to Social Security and 1.45% to Medicare. And your employer is also matching that.

SPEAKER_01 3:17

Wow.

SPEAKER_00 3:18

So if you're working in France, roughly 15% of your total compensation is just vanishing into the US system, while the French government is simultaneously deducting their own social insurance taxes from your paycheck.

SPEAKER_02 3:30

Which are often much higher, right?

SPEAKER_00 3:31

Often much higher.

SPEAKER_02 3:32

And if you're self-employed, the math gets even darker, doesn't it?

SPEAKER_00 3:36

Oh, it's brutal.

SPEAKER_02 3:37

Because you act as both the employer and the employee. So you pay the SEA tax, which is a massive 15.3% on your net earnings.

SPEAKER_00 3:45

Exactly. Imagining a freelancer having to forfeit 15.3% to the IRS and then turning around and paying a host country's tax authority on top of that.

SPEAKER_02 3:55

I mean, that kind of margin would crush a small business before it even launched.

SPEAKER_00 3:58

It absolutely would. Which brings us to the obvious question, right? How is global commerce even possible under those conditions? Aaron Powell Yeah.

SPEAKER_02 4:05

If the system defaults to double taxation from day one, multinational corporations couldn't afford to send executives overseas.

SPEAKER_00 4:12

Aaron Powell Right, because the cost of making those employees whole would just be astronomical.

SPEAKER_02 4:17

Aaron Powell So there has to be a mechanism that overrides that default

Totalization Agreements Explained

SPEAKER_02 4:20

setting.

SPEAKER_00 4:20

Aaron Powell There is, thankfully. The rescue mission here comes in the form of what are called totalization agreements.

SPEAKER_02 4:25

Aaron Powell Totalization Agreements. Okay, what are those exactly?

SPEAKER_00 4:28

Aaron Powell They're bilateral treaties that the U.S. government negotiates one-on-one with other countries. Their explicit purpose is to eliminate this double taxation and ensure workers don't lose their benefits.

SPEAKER_02 4:39

Aaron Powell Okay, so how many of these are there?

SPEAKER_00 4:41

Currently, the U.S. holds active agreements with about 30 countries. This covers most of Europe, Australia, Japan, and several South American nations.

SPEAKER_02 4:50

Aaron Powell Knowing that these are negotiated treaties, I imagine they don't just, you know, flip a coin to decide which country gets to tax you. How do they actually draw the line?

SPEAKER_00 5:00

Aaron Powell Good question. So for traditional employees, these agreements rely heavily on what is called the detached worker rule.

SPEAKER_02 5:07

The detached worker rule.

SPEAKER_00 5:08

Yeah. And this rule draws a very specific line in the sand at the five-year mark.

SPEAKER_02 5:13

Five years.

SPEAKER_00 5:14

Right. The underlying logic here is intent. The governments need to determine if you are just temporarily working abroad or if you're actually putting down roots and integrating into the foreign country's economy long term.

SPEAKER_02 5:26

Aaron Powell So a five-year timeline is basically the ultimate litmus test for whether you're a temporary visitor or a permanent resident in the eyes of the tax agencies.

SPEAKER_00 5:35

Aaron Powell That's the standard framework, yes. If your US employer sends you to a treaty country for a temporary assignment expected to last five years or less, you are classified as a detached worker.

SPEAKER_03 5:47

Meaning.

SPEAKER_00 5:47

Meaning you remain entirely on the U.S.

Detached Worker Rule And Exceptions

SPEAKER_00 5:50

Social Security system, you and your employer continue paying the IRS, and you are granted full immunity from paying into the host country's system.

SPEAKER_02 5:58

Oh wow. Okay, that prevents a massive administrative nightmare for a company that's just trying to send, say, an engineer to Germany for a two-year project.

SPEAKER_00 6:07

Exactly. It keeps things simple.

SPEAKER_02 6:09

But if that project gets extended and they hit year six, the intent has clearly changed, right?

SPEAKER_00 6:14

The intent changes and the tax liability flips. Yeah. If you are transferred for more than five years from the outset, or and this is key, if a foreign employer hires you directly with no U.S. company involved, you are not considered detached.

SPEAKER_02 6:29

Trevor Burrus, Jr. You just switch entirely to the host country system.

SPEAKER_00 6:32

Exactly. You switch to their system and you become exempt from U.S. Social Security taxes.

SPEAKER_02 6:37

Aaron Ross Powell Okay, but because these are bilateral treaties negotiated country by country rather than some sweeping global law, there must be anomalies, right? Like what happens when the US sits down with different nations who have radically different social safety nets?

SPEAKER_00 6:51

Aaron Powell Oh, there are definite anomalies. The Wagon Maker and Oberly briefings highlight some fascinating exceptions that prove your exact point.

SPEAKER_01 6:59

Oh, really? Like what?

SPEAKER_00 7:00

Well, every tree reflects the priorities of the specific nations involved. Take Italy, for example.

SPEAKER_01 7:05

Right.

SPEAKER_00 7:06

The U.S.-Italy agreement contains no five-year constraint at all for detached workers.

SPEAKER_02 7:10

Wait, none. That is a massive loophole.

SPEAKER_00 7:13

It is.

SPEAKER_02 7:14

So an American could be sent to Rome by their U.S. employer for 15 years, buy a house, raise kids, and theoretically remain on the U.S. tax system the entire time.

SPEAKER_00 7:24

Under the strict terms of that specific treaty, yes.

SPEAKER_02 7:27

Wow. Why would Italy agree to that?

SPEAKER_00 7:30

Well, Italy's domestic pension system has historically been incredibly complex and burdened. Negotiating a strict cutoff was likely less beneficial for them than simply allowing long-term U.S. expats to remain off their books entirely.

SPEAKER_02 7:44

That's wild.

SPEAKER_00 7:45

But then on the complete opposite end of the spectrum, you have Denmark.

SPEAKER_02 7:49

What's Denmark's deal?

SPEAKER_00 7:50

For employees transferred from Denmark to the United States, the limit isn't five years. It's a strict three-year maximum to retain Danish social security coverage.

SPEAKER_02 8:00

Only three years. I guess that aggressive timeline makes sense when you look at the Danish model, right?

SPEAKER_00 8:05

How so?

SPEAKER_02 8:05

Well, Denmark funds its robust social safety net heavily through general taxation, and they tightly regulate integration into their welfare state. They want you contributing to the local system quickly, or they want you out of theirs.

SPEAKER_00 8:17

That is exactly the macroeconomic logic driving that three-year clause.

SPEAKER_02 8:22

Okay, so the detached worker rule is a brilliant shield if you have a massive corporate HR department moving you around and managing your temporary status.

SPEAKER_00 8:30

Right. But what if you don't have an employer to detach you? I mean, the modern workforce is full of independent contractors. If I'm a solo web developer moving to Lisbon, who is protecting me?

SPEAKER_02 8:41

Ah, that is a critical vulnerability. For self-employed individuals,

Self-Employed Residency Rule Risks

SPEAKER_02 8:45

the detached worker rule completely evaporates. Because there's no employer. Exactly. There's no employer to detach you. So instead, the treaties pivot to the residency rule.

SPEAKER_00 8:54

Residency rule. Got it.

SPEAKER_02 8:56

This dictates that self-employed workers, whether you're a freelance coder, an independent consultant, or even a minister sent abroad to plant a church, are subject to the social security system of the country where they legally reside.

SPEAKER_00 9:07

Aaron Powell Okay, so if I move to Portugal, which is one of the 30 treaty nations, and I establish legal residency there, I fall entirely under the Portuguese system.

SPEAKER_02 9:16

Aaron Powell You do. Because you reside there, your contributions go to Portugal. And the ultimate benefit here is that by utilizing this treaty, you legally bypass that brutal 15.3% U.S. self-employment tax.

SPEAKER_00 9:29

Which is an incredible financial relief for an entrepreneur.

SPEAKER_02 9:32

Huge relief. But wait, this entire safety net requires the host country to be on that list of 30 treaties.

SPEAKER_00 9:40

Oh, right.

SPEAKER_02 9:40

If you're listening to this right now while packing your bags for a country not on that list, you might want to sit down for this next part.

SPEAKER_00 9:46

Yeah, brace yourself.

SPEAKER_02 9:48

What happens if our freelancer sets up their laptop in a massive economic hub that the U.S. doesn't have an agreement with?

SPEAKER_00 9:55

The gaps in the treaty map are severe. Destinations like Singapore, Hong Kong, the United Arab Emirates, and Mexico do not have totalization agreements with the United States.

SPEAKER_02 10:04

Aaron Powell Wait, why not? The UAE and Singapore are huge destinations for global talent. It seems like a massive oversight not to have treaties with them.

SPEAKER_00 10:13

It's not an oversight so much as a structural incompatibility.

SPEAKER_02 10:16

What do you mean?

SPEAKER_00 10:17

Well, a totalization agreement requires a baseline level of reciprocity. The US operates on a pay-as-you-go payroll tax system to fund its pensions. Right. A place like the UAE, on the other hand, doesn't levy traditional income or payroll taxes on expats to fund a universal pension in the same way. Their social safety net is structured entirely differently.

SPEAKER_02 10:39

Oh, I see.

SPEAKER_00 10:40

Yeah. So because there's no equivalent system to align with, a one-to-one reciprocity treaty is functionally impossible. Trevor Burrus, Jr.

SPEAKER_02 10:47

Meaning the double tax trap in those countries is inescapable.

SPEAKER_00 10:51

Unavoidable. If you are self-employed in a non-treaty country like the UAE or Mexico, you will owe the IRS your 15.3% self-employment tax on your worldwide net earnings.

SPEAKER_02 11:03

Aaron Powell On top of the local taxes.

SPEAKER_00 11:04

Yes. In addition to whatever social insurance or mandatory provident fund contributions the local host country demands, there is no legal shield available to you.

SPEAKER_02 11:14

Aaron Powell Man, that is a harsh reality check for the digital nomad community. Aaron Powell Truly. Okay, let's look at the operational

Certificate Of Coverage Paperwork

SPEAKER_02 11:20

side of this. Say I am living in Germany, I'm fully aware I'm in a treaty country, and I know I'm protected under the five-year detached worker rule.

SPEAKER_00 11:27

Okay, good scenario.

SPEAKER_02 11:28

Aaron Powell The German tax authority isn't just going to take my word for it when I tell them I don't owe the money, right? There must be some sort of cross-border paperwork, like a hall pass from the IRS, that proves my immunity.

SPEAKER_00 11:39

Aaron Powell The Hall Pass concept is spot on. You cannot simply stop paying and assume the governments will sort it out.

SPEAKER_02 11:44

Aaron Ross Powell That sounds like a bad idea.

SPEAKER_00 11:46

It's a fast track to a devastating audit and frozen assets. The expat tax guides from Greenback Tax Services are incredibly blunt about this. They say you need a tangible paperwork shield called a certificate of coverage.

SPEAKER_02 12:00

Aaron Powell A certificate of coverage. And how is that generated? Does the IRS just mail it out when I change my address?

SPEAKER_00 12:06

No, no. It requires proactive filing. You must request it from the country whose system you are actively paying into.

SPEAKER_02 12:14

Aaron Powell Okay, so in my Germany scenario, since I'm staying on the U.S. system.

SPEAKER_00 12:17

Aaron Ross Powell Your U.S. employer applies to the Social Security Administration for this certificate.

SPEAKER_02 12:21

Aaron Powell Got it. So it serves as the physical proof of exemption. When the German tax auditors look at my payroll and ask why I'm not contributing to their social fund, I just hand them the U.S. certificate of coverage.

SPEAKER_00 12:33

Trevor Burrus And it immediately shuts down the inquiry. It proves you were already contributing to a recognized treaty partner.

SPEAKER_02 12:39

Aaron Powell That's incredibly powerful.

SPEAKER_00 12:40

Trevor Burrus It is, but Greenback stresses that you must secure the certificate before you even board the plane to start the assignment.

SPEAKER_02 12:47

Aaron Powell Before you leave.

SPEAKER_00 12:48

Yes. If you wait until tax season to figure this out, you will likely have taxes aggressively withheld by both countries, and you'll spend months fighting bureaucratic red tape trying to get those funds refunded.

SPEAKER_02 13:01

Okay, so the totalization agreement is the abstract legal shield, but the certificate of coverage is the physical sword you use to enforce it.

SPEAKER_00 13:10

Exactly.

SPEAKER_02 13:11

All right, we've established how to protect your paycheck today. But

Building A Multicountry Pension

SPEAKER_02 13:15

let's look at the long game. What happens in 30 years when it's time to retire?

SPEAKER_00 13:19

The fun part.

SPEAKER_02 13:20

Right. If someone has a chaotic, globally fragmented career, say, three years working in Germany, eight years in the US, and ten years in the UK, are they just out of luck because they never stayed in one place long enough to fully vest in a pension?

SPEAKER_00 13:33

This brings us to the second, equally vital purpose of totalization agreements. Without them, that worker would be facing a retirement disaster. Why? Because the U.S. requires 40 quarters of coverage, which equates to 10 full years of work to qualify for any Social Security retirement benefits. Expats frequently fall short of that threshold in any single country.

SPEAKER_02 13:54

So an eight-year stint in the U.S. leaves that worker two years short of receiving a dime, despite paying into the system for nearly a decade.

SPEAKER_00 14:02

Yep. That is where the magic of the treaty kicks in, though. Totalization allows countries to combine your work credits to push you over that eligibility finish line.

SPEAKER_02 14:12

Combine them.

SPEAKER_00 14:13

Well, to qualify for partial U.S. benefits under an agreement, the hurdle drops drastically. You only need a minimum of six U.S. credits, which is about one and a half years of American work history.

SPEAKER_01 14:24

Oh, wow.

SPEAKER_00 14:25

Yeah, and if you have that, the US will look at your time in Germany and the UK and allow you to count those foreign years to get past the 10-year requirement.

SPEAKER_02 14:34

Aaron Powell Ah, I see. It's essentially like transferring college credits. You know, you take freshman classes at one university, transfer to another for your sophomore year, and finish up at a third. When you combine the transcripts, the final university sees that you did the requisite work and they grant you the degree.

SPEAKER_00 14:49

Aaron Powell The University analogy works well for understanding eligibility, yes. But the SSA documentation provides a very necessary distinction regarding the payout.

SPEAKER_02 14:58

Aaron Powell What's the distinction?

SPEAKER_00 14:59

Your credits don't physically transfer or leave their origin country. Trevor Burrus, Jr.

SPEAKER_02 15:03

They don't.

SPEAKER_00 15:04

No. The U.S. is not absorbing your UK credits into the Washington Treasury.

SPEAKER_01 15:08

Aaron Powell Okay. If the credits stay put, how does the actual payout work?

SPEAKER_00 15:12

Aaron Powell Combining credits just unlocks the door to eligibility in each nation. Your contributions remain on your record in the country where you earned them. Okay. When you retire, you will receive a partial proportional benefit payment separately from each country based solely on the actual time you spent paying into their specific system.

SPEAKER_02 15:31

Aaron Powell So upon retiring, this worker would get a small monthly deposit from the US representing those eight years, another separate deposit from the UK for those ten years, and a minor deposit from Germany.

SPEAKER_00 15:43

Exactly.

SPEAKER_02 15:44

They're essentially stitching together a Frankenstein pension from multiple sovereign nations.

SPEAKER_00 15:49

A Frankenstein pension is a great way to visualize it. You totalize your time to prove you worked enough years globally, but the checks you receive are strictly proportional to what you paid into each

WEP Repeal And Medicare Catch

SPEAKER_00 16:00

local system.

SPEAKER_02 16:01

Okay, but here's where I have to push back on the math of this, because I've heard horror stories from older expats.

SPEAKER_00 16:07

Oh, I bet you have.

SPEAKER_02 16:08

If a retiree is collecting a proportional pension from the UK and another proportional pension from the US, isn't that considered double dipping? For a long time, the U.S. would severely penalize people for doing exactly this.

SPEAKER_00 16:21

You are referencing the Windfall Elimination Provision known as the WEP.

SPEAKER_01 16:26

The WEP, yeah.

SPEAKER_00 16:27

And historically, you would be completely correct. For decades, the WEP acted as a punitive measure. It drastically slashed U.S. Social Security benefits, sometimes by hundreds of dollars a month, if an expat was also receiving a foreign pension.

SPEAKER_02 16:43

Which feels so unfair if they earned it.

SPEAKER_00 16:44

It was a massive point of contention. But the latest 2026 sources detail a profound shift in this landscape.

SPEAKER_01 16:51

What change?

SPEAKER_00 16:52

In January 2025, the Social Security Fairness Act was passed, which completely repealed the WEP alongside the government pension offset.

SPEAKER_02 17:00

Wait, completely repeal. How does the U.S. system afford to pay out 100% of a benefit to someone who is also drawing a full government pension from the UK? Doesn't that strain the trust fund?

SPEAKER_00 17:12

It was a massive legislative debate, but it ultimately came down to the philosophy of earned benefits. Okay. The argument that won out was that workers paid those FICA taxes out of their own paychecks for the required amount of time. Penalizing public servants and international workers by reducing a benefit they mathematically paid for was deemed fundamentally unfair.

SPEAKER_01 17:33

Yeah, that tracks.

SPEAKER_00 17:34

So the penalty was abolished. Expats now get to keep 100% of the benefits they earned in both systems.

SPEAKER_02 17:40

That is amazing.

SPEAKER_00 17:40

And furthermore, the repeal was made retroactive to 2024. Retirees who had been suffering under the WP actually received lunk sum back payments to make them whole.

SPEAKER_02 17:50

Wow. That is life-altering news for anyone who spent their career hopping between treaty countries. It fundamentally validates the financial viability of a global career path.

SPEAKER_00 18:00

It really does.

SPEAKER_02 18:01

However, before we declare total victory over the tax code, is there a final caveat we need to be aware of? What is the catch here?

SPEAKER_00 18:07

There's always a catch, right? Always. The catch involves health care, specifically regarding the US system. We have established that totalization agreements protect your retirement, disability, and survivor benefits.

SPEAKER_02 18:18

Right.

SPEAKER_00 18:19

But they explicitly do not cover Medicare.

SPEAKER_02 18:21

Aaron Ross Powell Wait, but FICA taxes include Medicare. We established earlier that the 7.65% includes 1.45%, specifically earmarked for Medicare. If I'm paying into it, why isn't it totalized?

SPEAKER_00 18:35

Aaron Ross Powell It is incredibly counterintuitive, I know. Yeah. The reasoning is that Medicare is an entirely different fund with different eligibility mechanics, deeply tied to U.S. residency and the domestic healthcare infrastructure. Okay. So you cannot use foreign work credits to reach the 10-year threshold required for free U.S. Medicare Part A hospital insurance when you turn 65. You must earn those 40 quarters entirely through domestic U.S. work history.

SPEAKER_02 19:01

The strategic implications of that are huge. You could perfectly orchestrate your international career, utilize every treaty, and retire back in the U.S. with a wonderfully healthy combined global pension. But because your foreign years don't count toward Medicare, you could find yourself entirely on the hook for massive hospital insurance premiums in your senior years.

SPEAKER_00 19:20

Which is exactly why relying solely on treaties isn't enough. If your ultimate goal is to return to the U.S. for retirement, you have to ensure you physically log 10 years of domestic work to secure that healthcare coverage.

SPEAKER_02 19:33

This entire deep dive has been a masterclass in global financial survival. To summarize the toolkit we've built, if you're working across borders, totalization agreements are your baseline shield against the crushing weight of dual taxation.

SPEAKER_00 19:47

Right.

SPEAKER_02 19:48

But you have to verify that your destination is actually on the treaty list rather than a danger zone like the UAE or Singapore.

SPEAKER_00 19:54

And you must actively deploy that shield by demanding a certificate of coverage from your home tax authority before you begin the work.

SPEAKER_02 20:01

Then at the end of your career, those same treaties allow you to combine your fragmented work history, unlocking eligibility across borders, and allowing you to collect a penalty-free multinational pension thanks to the 2025 WEP repeal.

SPEAKER_00 20:15

Exactly. Just remember that Medicare requires a strictly American timeline.

SPEAKER_02 20:20

Right. Seeing how intricately we have to stitch together a retirement from the laws of different

Big Question For Borderless Retirement

SPEAKER_02 20:25

sovereign nations really highlights a larger shift.

SPEAKER_00 20:28

It definitely does.

SPEAKER_02 20:29

It requires navigating overlapping treaties, acquiring certificates, and calculating proportional payouts.

SPEAKER_00 20:35

Yeah.

SPEAKER_02 20:36

But as remote work continues to make national borders invisible to the daily reality of the worker, it begs a massive question.

SPEAKER_00 20:44

What's that?

SPEAKER_02 20:45

How long will it be before the global financial system is forced to entirely reimagine the concept of a national retirement fund?

SPEAKER_00 20:52

Well, our current taxation framework is entirely anchored to physical geography and citizenship, yet the modern economy is increasingly independent of both. Right. The friction between those two realities is only going to grow.

SPEAKER_03 21:04

If we are effectively living and working as global citizens today, what does a truly global borderless retirement mechanism look like tomorrow? That is something to ponder the next time you log on from a cafe in a new time zone. Thank you for joining us for this deep dive into the world of international tax and retirement. Keep asking the hard questions and keep learning.